Baltimore sucks at Fanduel, draftkings on promotional tactics, lack of safeguard

A cause that the city of Baltimore has intended on Thursday accusation important sports books Fanduel and Draftkings to use user data for targeting and food dependencies. It also claims that companies have done everything to avoid implementing the guarantees of users required in other countries in which they operate.

The cause, which includes the lawyer of Baltimora City Ebony Thompson as a plaintiff, indicates Maryland’s sports betting rules, claiming that companies have violated a ban on practices that “may have a negative impact on the public”.

“Draftkings and Fanduel have tried to guarantee their profitability by cheating, hoping to hook up, and in the end exploiting, as many users as possible,” said the cause.

The mayor of Baltimora Brandon Scott has released a declaration to multiple stores regarding the dispute: “These companies are working in shady practices and the people of our city are literally paying the price. Draftkings and Fanduel have specifically targeted our most vulnerable residents – including those who fight with gambling disorders – including the game disorders – including those Gambling disorders.

According to the cause, bettors in Maryland bet over 5 billion dollars between July 2023 and June 2024 and state bets have eclipsed $ 3.7 billion since October. Fanduel and Draftkings collectively control 70 to 75 percent of online sports betting in the United States in general, according to a March of LinkedIn report.

“Fanduel does not comment on specific accusations in suspended dispute,” said the company on Friday. “We are confident that the company operates in accordance with all the laws, including those established and applied by the lottery and the Maryland games control commission.”

Draftkings refused to comment on the cause.

At the center of the complaint is the selective use of the user’s data by the companies. Both sports books collect extensive banking and personal information to inform how and when to encourage people to bet more. However, Baltimore officials said that neither companies use this information to evaluate whether users are forming unhealthy habits or are making risky bets that cannot afford. The cause claims that dissonance illustrates how companies give priority to profits on the reduction of damage.

“Given the amount of data they have on their consumers, the inability of the defendants to perform income verification checks allows them to profess ignorance or, at best, remain intentionally ignorant, that many so -called” high rollers “in their VIP programs are demonstrating the signs of signs of destruction of a gambling disorder,” said the cause. “This, in turn, allows them to throw themselves into plausible denabilities and say that they do not know if the members of their VIP programs have such ailments, all by collecting beam of behavioral data that allow them to hit the most vulnerable.”

The criticism also criticizes the promotional stream that offers both sports books to attract gamblers. Text messages, notifications and push warnings that users receive create “the false idea that users are obtaining” free bets “or otherwise assume a risk substantially lower than what they are actually”, said the cause.

These practices could be particularly harmful to those who fight with addiction, teenagers and others who may not look deeper in the end press of the offers, according to the suit.

The cause also mentions a Studio 2016 Published on the Journal of Gambling Studies This found that “problematic prawns” partners are 10 times more likely to be hospitalized with physical injuries compared to the partners of “problematic drinkers”. He also said that children of individuals with gaming problems are two or three times more likely to be abused than those of other families.

“As some researchers have suggested, the same behavioral data that can be used to identify problem gambling and build tools to exploit those gamblers more efficiently can also be used to create socially responsible tools that can help fight the dependence behavior of these same people,” said the cause.

Further safeguards Baltimore officials would like to see financial vulnerability controls and stronger protections for people under the age of 25, who are mandatory for sports books in the United Kingdom.

The city is asking the Court to order that Fanduel and Draftkings also implement similar measures in the United States, together with financial penalties for violations of the Code of the City of Baltimore.

Note of the editor: The Athletic has a partnership with Betmgm. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control or input in the report or modification process and do not re -examine the stories before publication.

(Photo: Aaron M. Sprecher / Getty Images)