A benign and perfectly carved image of vitality … or the attractive face of toxic masculinity? | Sarah Manavis

HOW starts the perfect morning? With delicate stretching, a coffee in bed? It could be a walk in the sun, a hot breakfast or simply be able to spend the first 20 minutes from the phone before spending the next 20 Instagram. Lately, it may seem that the answer is more productive.

The optimized morning routine has become an almost mythical ideal for young people, sold by fitness influencers who obsessively publish their departures of 5.30, claiming to finish their training with weights, meals and e-mails rich in macronutrients before our first alarm-repromising that everything in your life would be better if you also had the discipline to get up soon.

Our comparative feelings of inadequacy in response to this tendency may have reached new heights last month, after the morning viral routine from the US fitness influencer Ashton Hall. The video presents him to get up at 3.52, immersing his face in multiple ice baths, following an idiosyncratic routine for skin care (which involves banana peel), meditating, Journal and completing several workouts to maintain his body torn. The female staff wretches in the background, bringing towels and ice, preparing it breakfast and delivering bottles of branded glass water – these women often seen only as a couple of hands. In the caption on Tiktok and Instagram, Hall says that this routine “has changed his life”; By warning that “sin lives late at night” and to cope with “a weak mind, wrong decisions or lack of productivity”, its followers should go to sleep early and spend the first four hours of the day practicing this rigid dome program. You have probably already seen this video: at the time of the drafting, more than 900 meters was seen on various platforms.

In the days when the routine was shared, he took a large comment, with many questions If men are fineIf the video is also so serious (Hall is a creator of content for work and this could easily be a bait of pure anger) and ask what it says about modern masculinity. The activist Matt Bernstein noted on X: “15 years ago this routine would make you call gay (or” metro -member “) but now it is considered the peak peak alpha.

We spent three years talking about the chilling ascent of the Hyper-Macchina, Andrew Tate-The influencer of style misogyny, which promote an alpha brand that seems very different from that of Hall: one that glorifies domestic violence, explicitly states that women deserve limited rights and widely manage a vision of gender dynamics that were common 80 years ago. Hall’s video has also become viral in the middle of a public discussion on what to do with these ideas that proliferate on social media, stimulated by the popularity of the Netflix series AdolescenceWhich makes the topic a little thin according to which all young people are susceptible to the violent misogynist thought. Consequently, this video might seem a departure from what we have known from the alpha-influenzars, revealing a perhaps absurd corner of the male self-tacting space online, but one that is completely harmless.

Hall’s video undoubtedly shows us a ridiculous side of busy culture. But is it all that tells us about men today? Despite his rehabilitation-and even the relative sweetness and kindness of hall compared to those like Tate, thanking women in his video content is the proof of a handwriting once lightning is exactly part of the mainstream. Now he has space to adapt and evolve to meet a growing audience of young boys attracted by a conservative philosophy, in which Hall launches a less toxic version of a similar ethos.

While many men can be deactivated by the Palence of Tate, this does not mean that they are off in a world defined by male domain. Contents like this play in an self -centered male fantasy that glorifies the impossible image of a perfectly sculpted physique and encourages hustle and muddy men and grinding to meet an austere and obsessed brand from success.

Elsewhere, Hall promotes a Christian and Puritan-Non life only through its content, but through its scheme of tutoring (paid), in which it trains men to avoid the culture of the connection and stop trying to impress women; A, on the other hand, to change their life in service to themselves and to God. Like Beth McColl, the writer and co-conductor of the podcast of cultures Everything is happyHe said in a recent episode dedicated to Hall’s video: “You have to live this clean life in the service of God – but you are almost God himself, because everything is actually at the service of your perfection”.

This content is obviously less misogynist, but is still designed to promote regressive ideas on masculinity, which strengthen the new wave of conservatism that we started to see among the men of Gen-Z. Men They are placed in the center of the universe, expected and served by obedient, submissive and secondary women, if they are even considered. However, unlike the contents of those who explicitly support a patriarchal hierarchy, these videos mask themselves as something senselessly benign – giving them, sometimes, a greater power to spread through the implicit message that this is what men and women are good, happy, successful.

There are a number regarding boys and men who align with the extreme views of figures like Tate. But alone, nanny and men like him cannot move a wider culture. What can is the reverberation echo of something more attractive, which pushes us more and closer to the same thing. Our reactionary turn will seem much more similar to what Hall offers: a thin lean towards patriarchy, who wears its reasons more slightly while feeding on our numerous new misoginia channels.

Ashton Hall is not the cause of our current genre gap, but we should not deceive ourselves in thinking about content as if his is not part of the problem. We guarantee a worst future, letting these ideas commit themselves in plain sight, uncontrolled – rejecting something left as nothing but foolish.

Sarah Manavis is an American writer and criticism that lives in the United Kingdom

• Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you want to send a letter up to 250 words to consider for publication, send us an and -mail to Observer.letters@observer.co.uk