Anthony Glumac loses the struggle in court to suppress his identity

The 28 -year -old is accused of repeated acts of sexual intercourse without consensus, aggravated aggravated aggravations that inflict real body damage, indecent aggressions, suffocation, intimidation and sexual touch.

The crown states that Glumec identified emotionally or physically vulnerable women, including those who had health or relationship problems, and made an unsolicited conversation on Facebook, Tinder and Snapchat before meeting in isolated places or in vehicles.

In his opening speech, the crown prosecutor Mark Hay, the alleged Glumac had a sexual interest in “approximate sexual acts”, a “distinct and evident interest in rape porn” and a tendency to sexual conduct with women “after repeatedly said they didn’t want”.

He said that Glumac had a propensity for male domain and that the “thoughts and feelings” of women engaged in sexual activity were secondary considerations, “if considerations”. After an alleged rape, Glumac would have told the woman that “he was teaching how to let people treat her.”

Hay anticipated that another denunciation would provide evidence that he said: “I don’t want to do it”, to which Glumac would have replied: “All the girls want him”.

He said Glumac asked his sexual partners to call him “dad” and put a hand around his throat, in some cases applying strength so that they could not breathe.

The court felt that a woman should have said that the glume passed a steak knife along her throat and then slapped her in the face.

The prosecutor said that women were mostly unknown to each other and “they had no way of knowing what everyone would have said”, but their accusations on the Glumac behavior were “so surprisingly similar that they were beyond a coincidence”. Each denunciation was “powerful” evidence, but together they had a cumulative weight, he added.

The court felt that Glumac presumably took photos and videos of people with whom he had sex and his phone contained a “very large number of images” of him who committed himself to sexual acts with young women.

Hay said that the crown was unable to say if any of the complaints was depicted in the images, but some expected that some would have evidence of having “seen a flash” during their alleged sexual contact.

The court has heard that most of the complaints went on after a release of the police media on the Glumac arrest, when public ministries say that the “true extension of the alleged crime” has become known.

Glumac’s lawyer Luke Brasch has chosen not to give an opening address, but the crown has anticipated that there would be a dispute that acts have occurred, if they occurred in the way in which the complaints alleged and the issue of consent.

“No proof” of threats or violence

Glumac, through his lawyers, said he had been attacked three times by his companions held during the mandate and said that the threats to his safety intensified every time there was a media coverage.

In opposition to Glumac’s application to hide his identity, executive consultant for the Herald, Larina Alick claimed that her request was based on the idea that the corrective services were “incapable” to protect it in custody, where it was held for more than four years.

“People face rape processes and murder processes in the courts of the new South Wales without having non -public orders on their name and photos.”

Larina Alick, Herald executive consultant

Alick said that there was no imminent threat, and while he was “understandable fear” he did not equate to no more than a simple conviction of future damage.

He said there was an “insufficient connection” between past news relationships and the clashes collected by Glumecc, who did not require medical treatment and had not been reported to the authorities.

“People face rape processes and murder processes in the courts of the new South Wales without having orders for non -publication for their name and photos,” said Alick. In the interest of open justice, an order should be issued only in exceptional circumstances, he said.

Prosecutor Shannon Richards claimed that there was no evidence in support of the statements of threats or extortion of the death of Glumac, nor the three alleged assaults. He said the threshold of necessity for an order had not been achieved.

The Glumac process is estimated to take place for several months.

The day begins with a summary of the most important and interesting analysis of the analysis and intuitions of the day. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.