Dawn Singleton’s family launches a legal action against nine, Sydney Morning Herald
“We also want to add to the photographs that nine Entertainment Group has used without the consent of our customers in the last year.”
Chrysanthou said this was “an extremely distressing situation for my customers”.
“The anniversary (one year) of their boyfriend and the death of his daughter is Sunday,” he said.
Chrysanthou said that copyright statements were “quite simple: someone has the photo, someone uses it and there is permission or is not there”.
But the lawyer Lyndelle Barnett, who appears to nine, said it was not “simple and simple”.
“My customers are very eager to be respectful and inclusive of complaints as we can be,” said Barnett. “But to the extent that there will be very large brush requests on the reporting of a very tragic event in the last year, we must be able to face it and answer.”
John Singleton is not part of the cause on copyright. He said 60 minutes He did not support Bondi Junction’s investigation, but his public comments exhibited a schism in the family.
Dawn Singleton’s father, John Singleton, asked that the investigation was canceled and requested if he would provide any advantage.Credit: 60 minutes
Dawn’s sister, Daisy Singleton, said in Instagram’s comments: “He simply hadn’t seen her since she was 8 years old and she is not business to talk about her on national TV while the family (her) is in mourning. Her family has involved him not to do this interview”.
Compulsory investigation
Under the new South Wales Coroners ActAn investigation is necessary to be held When a person dies due to a murder or police operation.
Chrysanthou, who appears in the investigation for Dawn Singleton’s family, excluding John, as well as for the families of Ash Good and Jade Young, told a preliminary hearing of the Monday investigation that his customers “understand the compulsory nature of this investigation and support it”.
Chrysanthou acted for the smoker -condemned drug smoker contrabenters in a fight for violation of the copyright of the Federal Court on a book containing photos taken by Corby Mercedes and others sister. The family he won the copyright suit And the book was pulled.
Equal exception
The cause of Singleton will be expected to listen to several legal arguments to the Corby case, including if the use of photos would fall within the exception of “fair split” for news reports.
There are also questions about who owns copyright. The person who takes a photo or a video is generally the copyright owner. When a person dies, their copyright is part of their heritage.
Barnett said that an urgent preliminary hearing in copyright struggle took place on Friday evening and focused on “Two photographs, some videos that we had already accepted not to publish and a general request for material on social media”. But “the purpose of this procedure is expanding”.
Barnett claimed to have anticipated that there would be a “good fair discussion”, as well as questions about “the circumstances in which those images made their way into the public domain and if there is any topic of an implicit license”.
Judge Francois Kunc gave permission to the sued to add new defendants to the case. An updated complaint will be archived on Friday. The parties return to court on May 2nd.
The day begins with a summary of the most important and interesting analysis of the analysis and intuitions of the day. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
