Exclusive: functioning of the Democrats, reports the “Shady Trial Lawyer Pipeline” report.
EXCLUSIVE – One of the main consumer protection companies in the country has today published a report that exposed a “pipeline of shady lawyers” of politicians who distribute public contracts for income to trial lawyers, which in turn contribute to millions of dollars to liberal political campaigns, including $ 1.4 million to that Harris-Walz campaign in 2024.
The report – published by Alliance for Consumer (AFC) – highlights the deep Democratic Ties of eight main consumer protection law firms – Morgan & Morgan, Lieff Cabraser, Motley Rice, Baron & Budd, Grant & Eisenhofer, Berger Montague, Cohen Milstein and Simmons Hangly – who dubious “shadows”.
According to AFC, these companies take public contracts throughout the country and have contributed to approximately $ 25 million in political donations from 2017 to 2024.
Only in 2024, companies collectively donated $ 4 million to political campaigns, 99% of which was for democratic candidates or democratic allies.
EXCLUSIVE: GOP Firebrand OSA I DEMS to condemn the attacks on Elon Musk’s Tesla
One of the main consumer protection companies in the country has today published a report that exposed a “pipeline of shaded lawyers” of politicians who distribute public contracts for profit to the process lawyers, which in turn contribute to millions of dollars to liberal political campaigns, including 1.4 million dollars in the Harris-Walz campaign in 2024. (Istock/Getty)
During the presidential elections of 2024, the companies contributed with $ 1.4 million to the campaign of the former vice -president Kamala Harris.
The Shady Eight also gave priority to the medium -term senate races, found the relationship, with Sen. Ruben GallegoD-ARIZ. And ex sens. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, Bob Casey, D-Penn. And Jon Tester, D-Mont. receiving the greatest contributions next to Harris.
Five companies – Cobraser Lieff, Motley Rice, Grant & Eisenhofer, Simmons Hanly and Baron & Budd – showed a 100% commitment to Democrats and their allies, generating over 2.5 million dollars in federal donations in 2024.
“The consumer should never be on the loser part of a left -wing political money game like the one that is on display in the pipeline of shady trial lawyers,” says AFC in his relationship. “This partisan political donation is supported by money by public contracts signed by public politicians and officials; money belongs to taxpayers and consumers”.
Tesla’s hypocrisy: Dems continues to invest in Elon Musk Company despite painting him as bad
The Ody Eight also gave priority to the medium-term senate races, the relationship discovered, with Senator Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz. And the former sens. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, Bob Casey, D-Penn. And Jon Tester, D-Mont., Receiving the greatest contributions next to the vice-president Kamala Harris. (Getty Images)
AFC said that “the” shady eight “are clear examples-even if far from those of a single-of how the pipeline of a shady test lawyer works, with politicians who feed contracts in love with trial lawyers who give 99% of their political donations to liberals and will run happily and will pump millions of dollars in dollars with candidates on the left, commissions and ally.
Oh Skinner, executive director of the alliance for consumers, told Fox News Digital that the report “shows how left -wing trial lawyers have transformed consumer protection efforts into a political game”.
He urged states to move to end their contracts with these “shady” law firms.
Judge James Boasberg, on the left, and President Donald Trump. (Getty Images)
“The contracts that states have with these companies make sense if the goal is financing left political campaigns, but for many reasons, they are exactly the wrong way to protect consumers,” he said. “The end of the pipeline of shaded test lawyers is one of the strongest steps that public officials can undertake to protect consumers and the rule of law”.
Click here to get the Fox News App
This comes when the Republicans at the congress move to curb the “out of control” judgments by activists who have inhibited some of the most prepared aspects of the Trump Administration’s Agenda, such as the application of immigration and deportation of the members of the criminal migrant band.
