Taylor Auerbach sued for presumably denigration comments
While Lee did not make detailed results on the tests of Auerbach, he said that it was “right to conclude that Mr. Lehrmann was less than candid in his report of the entity of the benefits he had received before and of exchange for his deal to participate in making exclusive interviews with seven.
Loading
“It is right to observe that the evidence reveals that some of the pre-compact incentives and the considerations that flow in the direction of a contractual counterpart were of a non-orthodox type and without documents,” said Lee.
This seems to be a reference to the tests of Auerbach who seven reimbursed Lehrmann for the cost of cocaine and prostitutes.
During the case of defamation, the Court also heard that seven spent about $ 100,000 paying the Lehrmann rental for a year in April 2024 with an exclusive interview agreement.
Lee said that Auerbach “threw the accusations of thick against a variety of people”, including “his former work colleagues”, but these statements were largely irrelevant to the case.
Auerbach said it ReflectorThe executive manufacturer, Mark Llewellyn, was present when Lehrmann leaked information reserved by his criminal proceeding, that is, messages between Higgins e Sydney Morning Herald The editorialist and author Peter Fitzsimons, Wilkinson’s husband.
Lee said that “the inevitable conclusion is that Lehrmann has provided access to Mr. Llewellyn to take (photos of the messages) … and therefore erroneously provided him access to information” in text messages.
“The representations and evidence of the opposite of Lehrmann were false for his knowledge on a serious question, and this conclusion fortifies my evaluation on his general credit,” said Lee.
The day begins with a summary of the most important and interesting analysis of the analysis and intuitions of the day. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
