The charity feels of Prince Harry was investigated by the charity commission
A guard dog intensified his investigations on “raised concerns” on a charity organization founded by Duke of the Sussexin the midst of a battle of the Council room within the organization.
THE Charity commission He said he opened a case of regulatory conformity to Sental, a week after it emerged that Harry was stopped as patron.
The Royal founded the organization in 2006 in honor of her mother Diana, princess of Wales, with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, to help young people and children in southern Africa, in particular those with HIV and AIDS.
Last week it emerged that several trustees had left the beneficial organization in a dispute with its president, Sophie Chandauka, after requiring her resignation.
Harry and Prince Seeiso supported the trustees at the start and announced that they had discharged from customers to new notice.
They said that their resignation arrived “with heavy hearts”, adding that it was “devastating that the relationship between the trustees of Charity and the Prime Minister broke beyond repair, creating an unsustainable situation”.
Mr. Chandauka said that there had been “bad governance, weak executive management, Abuse of power, bullying, harassmentMisoginia, Misoginoir (racism against black women) “.
He also seemed to criticize Harry for going to the press and for what he described how to “play the victim’s card”.
And on the weekend, Ms Chandauka He said that the Duke had tried to expel it From charity through bullying and harassment.
A source close to the former trustees and customers rejected the comments of Ms Chandauka as “advertising acrobatics”.
The Commission declared that it had informed the beneficial organization on Wednesday that it has “opened a case of regulatory conformity to examine the concerns raised on the beneficial organization”.
The controversy, second TimesIt arose for a decision to focus fundraising on Africa.
The former trustees Timothy Boucher, Mark Dyer – A mentor and intimate friend of Harry’s – Audrey Kgosidintsi, Kelello Lerotholi and Damian West said that their decision to resign was devastating but was the “result of our loss of trust and trust in the presidency of the board of directors”.
The opening of a case of regulatory conformity allows the guard dog to collect evidence and “evaluate the compliance of charity and trusted and present with their duties and legal responsibilities pursuant to the charity law”.
It is not the same as a legal investigation.
The Commission, which said that the decision to open a case came after evaluating the initial concerns, said that it was in direct contact with the parties that had raised concerns.
Cases of regulatory compliance can lead to a series of results, including an official warning that is given to a beneficial organization or a legal investigation, which can give the commission further investigation powers.
