The liberal candidate Bennelong Scott Yung tackles more questions about the shopping of the non -disclosed campaign

“We generated four articles and each article varied somewhere between 10,000 views to over 30,000 views,” said Yung.

Loading

Yung’s Wechat profile articles were published in 10 days from 12 to 22 March 2019. The most viewed publication obtained 13,000 views and the others between 916 and 4449, according to WeChat Analytics. But the Herald He identified at least four other advertisements on Yung not directly connected to his profile.

Pursuant to NSW Electoral Funding Act 2018, the indirect contributions of the campaign to a candidate are considered illegal, including the “renunciation of all or part of the payment … for the advertising supported or to be supported”.

Yung did not respond to and -mail and calls that require comments.

In response to the questions, a spokesman for the Electoral Commission of the New South Wales stated that a search for published popularizations “has not identified any reference” A cover or Nay.

“The political parties and candidates are required to reveal all the electoral expenses incurred annually during the 12 -month period ends on June 30,” he said.

Asked by the conductor of Sky News Laura Jayes on Monday if there were other “skeletons in your wardrobe” after the HeraldThe story of his fundraising accident and a canceled podcast previously revealed by this mastheadYung did not respond directly.

“If this is the best that the other part has. What I concentrate on is to make sure to report a strong economic management, to reduce the cost of living,” he said.

Pressing that it had been “in advance and honest”, Yung replied: “100 percent”.

A spokesman for the liberal party said: “Covert was not a supplier of the HQ campaign of the liberal party. The party complies with all our election funding obligations pursuant to NSW and the relevant federal legislation”.

An advertising announcement published on WeChat e Sydney todayAn Australian Chinese site, on March 12, 2019, included the title: “It is a great success. This Chinese guy is everywhere in Sydney!” Hard more work, luckier you are! “Countless Chinese and Australian have been touched by him for this.”

False history praises Yung’s “extraordinary emotional intelligence” and its popularity with “grandmothers and uncles who are particularly good at judging people”.

“Everyone likes this sunny and talented boy,” says the article.

Another WeChat advertising published on February 20 was accompanied by the title: “This Chinese boy born in the 90s was appointed by the former Australian Prime Minister on the street! The first first ministers supported him! His story is worth hearing from all over the world”.

Both articles were written by AO Jiaoge, CEO of the AJ Studio Marketing company. The website of the SPRUIKS company its work in advertising, a form of advertising produced in editorial form.

Loading

“We are renowned to be advertising experts, having produced more than thousands of them completely for our different customers. The results speak more than the words – many of our customers have worked with us for years while witnessing spectacular growth in their advertising,” says the AJ website.

Yung’s electoral expenses do not reveal any reference to AJ Studio marketing.

AJ Studio did not respond to requests for comment.

Curiously, the YouTube interview with Brigham ends abruptly halfway through the sentence while Yung explains the distribution of the advertising content, an aspect of the strategy that described as “very critical” before his response is deactivated.

Brigham has attributed Yung’s truncated response to poor editing on his behalf, but said he could not provide the video in full.